Foodfight! (The End of Cinema as We Know It)

Started by Lord Dalek, October 28, 2012, 12:45:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1 2
User actions

Lord Dalek

October 28, 2012, 12:45:20 PM
This is the movie Mead had us watch after Avaitor left last night. It represents the death of cinema more than anything Lars Von Trier will EVER make.

DISCUSS.

Dr. Insomniac

#1
October 28, 2012, 12:46:12 PM
Remember that this was sitting in the backburner for 9 years. And that wasn't enough.

Avaitor

#2
October 28, 2012, 01:01:03 PM
This looks like something that even that rip-off company would be ashamed of.
Life is not about the second chances. It's about a little mouse and his voyage to an exciting new land. That, my friend, is what life is.

Sir, do you have any Warrants?
I got their first CD, but you can't have it, motherfucker!

New blog!
http://avaitorsblog.blogspot.com/

Foggle

#3
October 28, 2012, 01:01:54 PM
I honestly thought it was by the same studio as The Little Panda Fighter at first.

Dr. Insomniac

#4
October 28, 2012, 01:23:16 PM
According to some shady sources, this movie cost $50 million.

Commode

#5
October 28, 2012, 01:28:25 PM
Wait, they actually used food mascots, like Tony the Tiger or Toucan Sam or some shit?  Yeah, I can see why it would cost $50 Mil.
It doesn't matter what you say, soon you'll be dead anyway.

Dr. Insomniac

#6
October 28, 2012, 01:31:02 PM
More like Hawaiian Punch and the California Raisins.

Commode

#7
October 28, 2012, 01:32:05 PM
Not Punchy!
It doesn't matter what you say, soon you'll be dead anyway.

Rosalinas Spare Wand

#8
October 28, 2012, 05:44:37 PM
Why does everything look so flat?

Kiddington

#9
October 28, 2012, 05:56:12 PM
I am amazed that in this day and age, animation can still look so cheap.

Dr. Insomniac

#10
October 28, 2012, 05:57:01 PM
Quote from: Kiddington on October 28, 2012, 05:56:12 PM
I am amazed that in this day and age, animation can still look so cheap.
It was made in 2003, actually.

Kiddington

#11
October 28, 2012, 05:58:16 PM
Quote from: Dr. Insomniac on October 28, 2012, 05:57:01 PM
Quote from: Kiddington on October 28, 2012, 05:56:12 PM
I am amazed that in this day and age, animation can still look so cheap.
It was made in 2003, actually.

Ehhhhhh.

Dr. Insomniac

#12
October 28, 2012, 05:58:45 PM
Quote from: Kiddington on October 28, 2012, 05:58:16 PM
Quote from: Dr. Insomniac on October 28, 2012, 05:57:01 PM
Quote from: Kiddington on October 28, 2012, 05:56:12 PM
I am amazed that in this day and age, animation can still look so cheap.
It was made in 2003, actually.

Ehhhhhh.
:zonk:

Kiddington

#13
October 28, 2012, 06:02:03 PM
So why are we getting this now, then? Do I dare to assume it's been locked in rights hell all these years?

Dr. Insomniac

#14
October 28, 2012, 06:03:39 PM
Quote from: Kiddington on October 28, 2012, 06:02:03 PM
So why are we getting this now, then? Do I dare to assume it's been locked in rights hell all these years?
The company that made it got bankrupt, and was unable to actually release it. The rights were eventually auctioned off recently.
Print
Go Up Pages1 2
User actions